eternity in a bowl of cookie dough
Dec. 27th, 2009 03:51 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
gentle readers, i have a conundrum.
for many years, my signature cookie for gifts and contributions to inefficient fund-raising endeavors has been the humble oatmeal scotchie, the recipe for which conveniently located on the back of every bag i buy of nestle butterscotch morsels. on each occasion, i would smugly anticipate the happy result of my picturesque culinary efforts. ten minutes into the recipe, however, i would suddenly recollect the sheer amount of time remaining and forthcoming toll on my wrists with passionate loathing. yet i consoled myself with the thought that two hours plus of hard work was simply the price i had to pay for my four dozen allotments of unhealthy delight.
imagine my joy at discovering an intriguing new recipe of equivalent impressiveness that only required a mere twenty minutes to prepare, for a grand total of thirty-four minutes to yield the first tray of total forty-eight cookies. these cranberry orange cookies seemed an excellent addition to my usual holiday baking, permitting me to economize with twice the number of cookie-gifts for at most only a fifty-percent increase in time.
but it was not to be so. i was stuck in my kitchen for a straight four and a half hours, causing much concern and chastisement from the other inhabitants of my dwelling.
to add insult to injury, i discovered that the nestle website blithely lists the prep time for oatmeal scotchies as ten minutes, and the cook time as seven. these figures, i wish to emphasize for those not following carefully, are half those posted for cranberry orange cookies.
this is not a state of affairs that can be permitted to continue. my dignity, my self-respect, and the minor matter of my reputation as competent in the kitchen depend on closing the achievement gap between myself and those posting enthusiastic reviews on cooking websites with frequent resort to all caps. i have decided to throw myself on the collective mercy of crowd-sourcing. listen closely, dear readers, for i do not say this lightly: help me, omnomnom kenobi et al. you're my least embarrassing source of hope.
x-posted to
boilingwater
Font of post changed from courier new to 'default' as per request.
for many years, my signature cookie for gifts and contributions to inefficient fund-raising endeavors has been the humble oatmeal scotchie, the recipe for which conveniently located on the back of every bag i buy of nestle butterscotch morsels. on each occasion, i would smugly anticipate the happy result of my picturesque culinary efforts. ten minutes into the recipe, however, i would suddenly recollect the sheer amount of time remaining and forthcoming toll on my wrists with passionate loathing. yet i consoled myself with the thought that two hours plus of hard work was simply the price i had to pay for my four dozen allotments of unhealthy delight.
imagine my joy at discovering an intriguing new recipe of equivalent impressiveness that only required a mere twenty minutes to prepare, for a grand total of thirty-four minutes to yield the first tray of total forty-eight cookies. these cranberry orange cookies seemed an excellent addition to my usual holiday baking, permitting me to economize with twice the number of cookie-gifts for at most only a fifty-percent increase in time.
but it was not to be so. i was stuck in my kitchen for a straight four and a half hours, causing much concern and chastisement from the other inhabitants of my dwelling.
to add insult to injury, i discovered that the nestle website blithely lists the prep time for oatmeal scotchies as ten minutes, and the cook time as seven. these figures, i wish to emphasize for those not following carefully, are half those posted for cranberry orange cookies.
this is not a state of affairs that can be permitted to continue. my dignity, my self-respect, and the minor matter of my reputation as competent in the kitchen depend on closing the achievement gap between myself and those posting enthusiastic reviews on cooking websites with frequent resort to all caps. i have decided to throw myself on the collective mercy of crowd-sourcing. listen closely, dear readers, for i do not say this lightly: help me, omnomnom kenobi et al. you're my least embarrassing source of hope.
x-posted to
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Font of post changed from courier new to 'default' as per request.
no subject
on 2009-12-27 09:11 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2009-12-27 10:07 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2009-12-27 10:09 pm (UTC)The dance of trays in and out of the oven is something rather unavoidable unless you've got enough trays to batch out all of your dough at once, and adequate counter space to rotate trays and let things cool properly. How many baking trays do you have? Cooling racks? How much counter space?
no subject
on 2009-12-27 11:37 pm (UTC)a kitchen slavean assistant, this takes longer than i would like. i find myself suspecting that this essential prior assemblage is struck from the mockingly low 'prep time' asserted by the aforementioned recipes.on friday, i found myself in possession of two large cookie trays for the first time in my baking experience. halleluiah. otherwise, i possess four of inconvenient size and rectangular shape, two by four grid capacity, and two more square, with three by four capacity. counter space is decent, but quite spread out. cooling racks may well be the rate-determining step in how fast trays can move in and out of the oven; before shifting the parchment paper + cookies off a particular tray, i must always shift the previous batch off my sole & rather decrepit cooling rack. on further consideration, the limited counter space near the top of the oven also complicates matters, requiring consolidation and/or relocation of cooling cookies relatively quickly.
i had not thought of attempting to 'batch out' all of my dough at once, but in hindsight it seems blindly obvious. it would solve the problem of overly warm dough and necessity of periodic chilling, permit closer monitoring of baking progress, and eliminate variance in starting time between concurrent trays. brilliant.
thank you for sharing your experience with me. surely i can engineer the flow of the oven stage more efficiently for my particular set of kitchen variables; must think on this further.
no subject
on 2009-12-28 03:25 am (UTC)no subject
on 2009-12-28 04:26 am (UTC)no subject
on 2009-12-28 04:38 am (UTC)no subject
on 2009-12-28 05:10 am (UTC)Wow, you must have had quite a warm kitchen! I hope today's baking went well regardless?
no subject
on 2009-12-28 05:19 am (UTC)no subject
on 2009-12-28 05:58 am (UTC)no subject
on 2009-12-28 12:28 am (UTC)You need two trays + insane amounts of parchment paper + some counter/table space.
Put parchment paper on the first two trays and fill them with raw cookies. If you need to do something to them when they're cooked but still hot, put only one of the trays in the oven, then put the second when approximately half the cooking time for the first tray has passed. That way you're staggering it, which makes it easier logistically. I also suggest putting the tray first on the bottom grid, then switching it to the top grid when you're changing the other tray.
For the rest of the cookies, put them on parchment paper cut approximately the size of the tray. When you take a tray out of the oven, you slid the parchment paper onto a cooling rack, then slid a full parchment paper onto the tray and pop it back into the oven.
I suggest preparing all the batches before starting to bake, otherwise you'll find that you can't keep up, which is just annoying :)
no subject
on 2009-12-28 01:44 am (UTC)amusingly enough, i do usually cut out all the appropriately-sized sheets of parchment paper i will need beforehand. that i didn't make the necessary mental leap lends vague credence to insinuations from certain parties not to be named regarding head-damage as a small child. ETA: and now i confirm with my careless disregard for closing html tags, etcetera. many apologies.
thank you for your suggestions; i hope our mutual enthusiasm for this most unappreciated of baking necessities will enlighten some other poor soul scrolling through these comments in equally desperate straits.
no subject
on 2009-12-28 04:49 pm (UTC)If you want me to show you how, let me know:
- what browser you use
- whether you want every single font on the web to display as Courier New, or just Dreamwidth
:)
no subject
on 2009-12-27 09:25 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2009-12-27 10:08 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2009-12-27 10:35 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2009-12-27 11:03 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2009-12-28 12:07 am (UTC)no subject
on 2009-12-28 12:20 am (UTC)no subject
on 2009-12-28 01:05 am (UTC)no subject
on 2009-12-28 10:44 am (UTC)For any recipe that calls for creaming butter and sugar together, leave the butter on the counter for half an hour first to soften. Your wrists will thank you.
no subject
on 2009-12-27 11:01 pm (UTC)aside from that, organisation helps. have your ingredients together and at room temp, have your racks and cookie sheets ready, preheat the oven, mix the dough.
most ovens have at least 2 racks, so one can do 2 sheets' worth of cookies at a time; if you have 4 sheets, that's only 2 batches thru the oven. when one batch comes out, slide the other in, let the cookies on the first racks cool a couple minutes, then put them on racks.
if you've only 2 racks, let them cool until they're cool to the touch, then drop and bake the 2nd set.
i fill the sink with hot soapy water either before i start or when the first batch are in the oven, and drop everything into it as i finish with it. then clean up takes only a couple minutes.
no subject
on 2009-12-28 12:55 am (UTC)luckily, my counters are sufficiently cool to safely shorten time on the rack. cleanup of trays is unnecessary due to blatant use of parchment or wax paper for lining them prior to application of cookie dough. this latter also facilitates transportation of cookies from tray to rack, rack to counter, and permits cookie dough division when trays are unavailable.
thank you for your suggestions; the use of mixers should certainly reduce the overall time.
no subject
on 2009-12-27 09:53 pm (UTC)*is thoroughly charmed, but not particularly helpful on cutting cookie-preparation time*
no subject
on 2009-12-27 10:10 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2009-12-27 10:04 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2009-12-27 10:32 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2009-12-27 10:36 pm (UTC)Thank you!
no subject
on 2009-12-27 10:28 pm (UTC)That's the only thought I have so far but shall ponder this further.....
no subject
on 2009-12-27 10:56 pm (UTC)the segregation
of the queenof wet and dry would also presumably permit refrigerating wet for one to two days before use.as for end additives such as oats or, for other recipes, chopped things of various categories, i am already in the habit of preparing them beforehand. i must admit to a certain pleasure in an uninterrupted mixing of the full sequence of ingredients followed by a speedy entrance into the oven.
no subject
on 2009-12-28 10:42 am (UTC)no subject
on 2009-12-28 09:50 pm (UTC)The benefit of this is that you can make a small batch of delicious cookies (or even just one or two) whenever you want. Mmm.
The important part is to shape your cookies before you freeze them, otherwise you have to thaw the whole chunk of dough. (I learned this the hard way.)
no subject
on 2009-12-28 09:56 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2009-12-28 10:28 pm (UTC)You can totally slap cookie dough in the fridge or the freezer just fine.
In fact, cookie dough often tastes better after being in the fridge over night. Like a soup or a casserole, the flavors mingle and develop more.